Lawrence G. Townsend Intellectual Property Lawyer
Schedule a consultation
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter

Youth theater infringes copyrights in musicals

News and Notes Focused on the 3 Public Faces of IP Law

  • Brand Image Protection - Trademark Law
  • Visual Image Protection - Copyright Law
  • Personal Image Protection - Right of Publicity Law

The Image Protection Law blog has been created in order to share stories and information on the legal aspects of: 1) the marketplace reputation of a company or product captured in its trademark, 2) published or publicly-displayed artwork, photography, and any created visual design, and 3) use of a person's photograph or likeness for product promotion or other commercial purposes.

The "IP3" share at least one thing in common: Image is everything. In these posts let's look at what that means in the realm of intellectual property in the news, but let's also be prepared to explore if there's something more beyond "everything." Don't forget, the intellectual in "intellectual property" doesn't mean smart or brainy, although by nature true creators often are. The word is used to refer to any creation, i.e., a "product of the mind." While this blog will be regularly updated, you are encouraged to share your thoughts on these posts.

Student, youth, nonprofit, and local theater companies must be careful to obtain permission and licensing to stage copyrighted plays and musicals. Even performance groups that may think of themselves as amateur or small scale must consider whether they are crossing the line into infringement and should seek advice from an intellectual property attorney to avoid legal liability.

Finding of infringement

For example, a federal court in Virginia has found a Virginia youth nonprofit theater company liable for almost a half-million dollars in damages for performing musical theater productions without proper licensing. In MTI Enter., Inc., v. Theaterpalooza Cmty Theater Prod., Inc., the court found that a youth theater company called Theaterpalooza staged three well-known musicals without obtaining licenses from the copyright holder, Music Theater International, known as MTI.

Monetary damages

The defendant had received prior notices and demands for it to buy licenses, but it failed to obtain licenses. Theaterpalooza did not respond to the complaint, and the matter proceeded to a default judgment. The judge adopted the main provisions of a U.S. Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation that the defendant theater knowingly and willfully infringed on copyrights in "Annie," "Hairspray" and "Mama Mia!" Federal law allows up to $150,000 in statutory damages for each violation, for a total assessment of $450,000. The court also awarded $1,532.72 in costs.

Injunctive relief

An important part of many copyright lawsuits is a request for a court order called an injunction that requires the defendant to stop engaging in the infringing conduct. In the MTI case, the judge entered a permanent injunction against Theaterpalooza to stop infringing on MTI's copyrights.

The court looked at the four factors that the U.S. Supreme Court said in eBay Inc., v. MercExchange, L.L.C., are relevant to this issue. The plaintiff must prove all four factors for a court to issue an injunction:

  • Irreparable injury to the plaintiff
  • Inadequacy of money damages
  • Balancing the hardships between the parties, the injunction is warranted
  • An injunction would not be against the public's interest

The MTI court opinion is available on Westlaw at 2019 WL 99267.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Contact Me to Discuss Your Specific Concerns

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy