Lawrence G. Townsend Intellectual Property Lawyer
Schedule a consultation
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter

Kawhi Leonard’s copyright fight with Nike over the “Klaw” logo

News and Notes Focused on the 3 Public Faces of IP Law

  • Brand Image Protection - Trademark Law
  • Visual Image Protection - Copyright Law
  • Personal Image Protection - Right of Publicity Law

The Image Protection Law blog has been created in order to share stories and information on the legal aspects of: 1) the marketplace reputation of a company or product captured in its trademark, 2) published or publicly-displayed artwork, photography, and any created visual design, and 3) use of a person's photograph or likeness for product promotion or other commercial purposes.

The "IP3" share at least one thing in common: Image is everything. In these posts let's look at what that means in the realm of intellectual property in the news, but let's also be prepared to explore if there's something more beyond "everything." Don't forget, the intellectual in "intellectual property" doesn't mean smart or brainy, although by nature true creators often are. The word is used to refer to any creation, i.e., a "product of the mind." While this blog will be regularly updated, you are encouraged to share your thoughts on these posts.

When we think of branding, we often think of trademarks, but when a logo is based on creative artwork, it can also involve copyright. This is so in a dispute between basketball great Kawhi Leonard and his former sponsor Nike over a logo based on a drawing by Leonard that he gave to Nike for use as inspiration for a logo it designed and copyrighted.

Leonard’s copyright lawsuit

Now that Leonard’s sponsorship agreement with Nike has expired, he wants to use the logo — dubbed the “Klaw” because it incorporates elements of his hand, initials and jersey number — in his current and future business dealings.

According to Forbes, Leonard filed a federal copyright infringement lawsuit in California alleging that Nike is not justified in claiming copyright ownership of the logo he says he created. Leonard reportedly claims that he let Nike use the logo; that he continued to use it on other merchandise not created by Nike; and that Nike registered the copyright on the logo without his knowledge or permission.

Forbes reports that the suit claims Leonard only gave limited permission to use the logo and that he did not intend to transfer all his rights to Nike.

Nike’s countersuit

Nike has responded with a countersuit saying that it does have copyright to the logo because its own designers created it distinctly from the original sketch by Leonard, according to Oregon Live. Nike reportedly says that Leonard approved its final design as part of its contract with the company. For its part, Nike also claims copyright infringement based on Leonard’s use of the logo on non-Nike goods, as well as breach of contract.

Nike says that the contract provides that it owns all intellectual property created during the contractual relationship, reports Oregon Live.

It also asks that the lawsuit be transferred to Oregon federal court based on the contractual terms of the agreement with Leonard.

Some in the media speculate that the parties will reach compromise and settle this lawsuit out of court rather than proceed to trial. It will be an interesting case to follow.

This dispute provides another example of the importance of careful, ironclad intellectual property contracts between sponsors and athletes in the professional sports world. The ownership and licensing rights of each party should be crystal clear by carefully worded and comprehensive, descriptive contract language. The clarity of the contract will impact the likelihood of future intellectual property litigation such as a copyright infringement suit.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Contact Me to Discuss Your Specific Concerns

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy