Lawrence G. Townsend Intellectual Property Lawyer
Schedule a consultation
415-882-3288
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter

ASCAP sues 19 bars and restaurants for copyright infringement

News and Notes Focused on the 3 Public Faces of IP Law

  • Brand Image Protection - Trademark Law
  • Visual Image Protection - Copyright Law
  • Personal Image Protection - Right of Publicity Law

The Image Protection Law blog has been created in order to share stories and information on the legal aspects of: 1) the marketplace reputation of a company or product captured in its trademark, 2) published or publicly-displayed artwork, photography, and any created visual design, and 3) use of a person's photograph or likeness for product promotion or other commercial purposes.

The "IP3" share at least one thing in common: Image is everything. In these posts let's look at what that means in the realm of intellectual property in the news, but let's also be prepared to explore if there's something more beyond "everything." Don't forget, the intellectual in "intellectual property" doesn't mean smart or brainy, although by nature true creators often are. The word is used to refer to any creation, i.e., a "product of the mind." While this blog will be regularly updated, you are encouraged to share your thoughts on these posts.

On Oct. 29, the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, known as ASCAP, announced it had filed 19 lawsuits for copyright infringement lawsuits. According to its press release, the suits target bars and restaurants with music venues that allegedly failed to obtain proper licenses from ASCAP for performances and other use of copyrighted works.

ASCAP is a nonprofit organization with 725,000 member composers, songwriters and music publishers. ASCAP handles licensing of members’ copyrighted works – numbering more than 11.5 million works of music - and in turn pays members royalties. ASCAP sells a collective license granting permission to use all these works without limit. Licenses are available not only to bars and restaurants, but also to radio, television, internet, mobile phone services and others.

ASCAP alleges that the defendant establishments have refused to purchase or honor licenses for members’ works and still allow them to be performed on their premises without permission. Defendants are 19 bars and restaurants across the country, including three in California.

Average annual licenses cost about $730.

According to the StarTribune, a bar in St. Paul, Minnesota, which is one of the defendants, settled with ASCAP the day of the lawsuit filing, but the details of the settlement were unavailable. That bar had told the paper before the settlement that their license fee had “nearly doubled in 2017 to over $10,000 annually … based on its 550-person capacity … and its frequency of events.”

Myrecordjournal.com reports that a Southington, Connecticut, defendant bar’s ownership group’s vice president said that ASCAP offered a $4,000 annual license, which the bar declined. The article says that one of the bar’s owners said on Facebook that ASCAP had been vague about what the license would cover and that ASCAP “had been difficult to work with.”

It will be interesting to see how other defendants react and what happens to these infringement lawsuits. We will keep readers informed.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Contact Me to Discuss Your Specific Concerns

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy